It is high time since I wrote on what I am reading. The primary reason nothing triggered me to write about it. It doesn't mean I ended up in wrong books. Most of them were either competitive or good, but not lingering enough. I read the recent best selling authors earlier works or consecutive works of same author. The first book impresses me and the second one started to show patterns. The only book I didn't finish and left in middle (actually I didn't read even one tenth :) )is Umberto Eco's Baudolino. the book is not compelling enough and also I had some other things to do. I am planning to read The Name of the Rose or Foucault's Pendulum.
The latest reading is 'on Writing' by Stephen King.Through the book Stephen King speaks to the reader about his life instances which groomed him as writer, what he did and how he did? Then he speaks more about what a potential writer shall do and lastly what writing is all about. The greatest strength about the book is it never becomes didactic. The important things he repeats are :
1. Write in active not in passive
2. Avoid adverb
3. Read a LOT and write a LOT. Do them with discipline
4. Don't wait for big story. Keep writing , the story and magical touch will come.
5. Don't bother on symbolism, theme, style , plot bla blas.. first tell the story.. allow the story to grow on its own. It will chose its own theme , style etc..on the course. On a subconscious level you will be telling what you want to tell.
6. Give a break, get back to story now bring in all you needed(theme, allusion etc..) and make sure to reduce the word count at least by 10%.
7. Give to your ideal reader. Get feedback and harness it.
The book is an interesting and must read for any one who thinks about writing.
Showing posts with label literature. Show all posts
Showing posts with label literature. Show all posts
Thursday, July 17, 2008
Monday, May 28, 2007
Why it de-railed?
When I watched Pachaikili muthucharam, i decided i shall read the original version : derailed -novel. The main reason was certain things were hanging out as unwanted appendage in movie. I was wondering why it was so? Is it because of story he took? Before speaking much on that I have to make some points clear.
Its really difficult to capture a novel into movie and it always disappoints the person who read the novel . There were certain things that makes the reader to love that novel and they might be simply cut in movie or the visualization of that never matches reader imagination. Even the best movies (critically acclaimed and commercially successful)were just close to the novels, they were never better than the novel, at least for me. Saying this, I never rated a movie based on what it tries to replicate. I have liked the movies which claims to be based on real life incident or based on novel and deviated much from them but still enjoyable one. I see them essentially as another creative output and as an independent entity.
Derailed is not a great novel. Its not a worse novel, but the problem is it was too ambitious. An novel is not just a collation of incidents. In our childhood , when someone tells us stories, we like to hear the story from the person who adds lot of color to the story than from the person who just states (may be narrates) the incident. Well James Siegel is not just narrating, he has included lot of sub-plots, some moments to stand still and cherish, but the problem is he has introduced lot of complications in the story, and takes the story back and forth just to surprise reader. Beyond a point things look like forced into the novel which makes the reader to yawn.
About Pachaikili muthucharam, the film fails simply because it tried to make too many compromises.The problem is not that movie deviates from the novel largely (Absolutely I have no issues on it. A good painting and good replication are different things).The problem is even after deviating from novel the director wants to use some elements from the novel which he liked. But they were not fitting well in to the new picture he had created . It goes like this. I decided to replicate a drawing which depicts a countryside with few men standing. People started to say something and I change it but I love the way the people dressed and want to keep it. so at last I come out with a different background and people costume just looks inappropriate.
They decide not to show the hero as a character having a weakness for opposite sex. They want to show as it was the lady who was desperate, that makes us doubt was he not suspicious of something?
All of a sudden he sees her again (after the blackmail is fully settled up)and just like follows her and know about her. Why he started to smell something fishy. An ordinary man probably will either try to move away or go and speak but why will he spy unless otherwise he smelled something wrong. The novel had it but for some reason movie skips it.
In novel, the protagonist knows that the main person is alive and wants to confront him and finish the story for ever. But in movie he thinks the story is over and so final duel does not look like a finishing touch but hangs like unwanted addition.
The novel brings the police into picture (though it does not use them exhaustively). But the movie never brings them, which looks odd in a movie which looks like near to life because of the dialogues, camera, lighting etc..
The crux is: The novel is essentially about a person who knows nothing about the dark world , but gets involved and learn their game through his experience (after mistakes and with lots of pain) and finally out play them. The movie has everything except those inside parenthesis. That make the viewer not to believe it.Its not we don't have the movies that lack that logic (all our super hero movies). The point is those movies don't disguise themselves as near to real life . They don't have the color, texture that our realistic movies have.
Its really difficult to capture a novel into movie and it always disappoints the person who read the novel . There were certain things that makes the reader to love that novel and they might be simply cut in movie or the visualization of that never matches reader imagination. Even the best movies (critically acclaimed and commercially successful)were just close to the novels, they were never better than the novel, at least for me. Saying this, I never rated a movie based on what it tries to replicate. I have liked the movies which claims to be based on real life incident or based on novel and deviated much from them but still enjoyable one. I see them essentially as another creative output and as an independent entity.
Derailed is not a great novel. Its not a worse novel, but the problem is it was too ambitious. An novel is not just a collation of incidents. In our childhood , when someone tells us stories, we like to hear the story from the person who adds lot of color to the story than from the person who just states (may be narrates) the incident. Well James Siegel is not just narrating, he has included lot of sub-plots, some moments to stand still and cherish, but the problem is he has introduced lot of complications in the story, and takes the story back and forth just to surprise reader. Beyond a point things look like forced into the novel which makes the reader to yawn.
About Pachaikili muthucharam, the film fails simply because it tried to make too many compromises.The problem is not that movie deviates from the novel largely (Absolutely I have no issues on it. A good painting and good replication are different things).The problem is even after deviating from novel the director wants to use some elements from the novel which he liked. But they were not fitting well in to the new picture he had created . It goes like this. I decided to replicate a drawing which depicts a countryside with few men standing. People started to say something and I change it but I love the way the people dressed and want to keep it. so at last I come out with a different background and people costume just looks inappropriate.
They decide not to show the hero as a character having a weakness for opposite sex. They want to show as it was the lady who was desperate, that makes us doubt was he not suspicious of something?
All of a sudden he sees her again (after the blackmail is fully settled up)and just like follows her and know about her. Why he started to smell something fishy. An ordinary man probably will either try to move away or go and speak but why will he spy unless otherwise he smelled something wrong. The novel had it but for some reason movie skips it.
In novel, the protagonist knows that the main person is alive and wants to confront him and finish the story for ever. But in movie he thinks the story is over and so final duel does not look like a finishing touch but hangs like unwanted addition.
The novel brings the police into picture (though it does not use them exhaustively). But the movie never brings them, which looks odd in a movie which looks like near to life because of the dialogues, camera, lighting etc..
The crux is: The novel is essentially about a person who knows nothing about the dark world , but gets involved and learn their game through his experience (after mistakes and with lots of pain) and finally out play them. The movie has everything except those inside parenthesis. That make the viewer not to believe it.Its not we don't have the movies that lack that logic (all our super hero movies). The point is those movies don't disguise themselves as near to real life . They don't have the color, texture that our realistic movies have.
Saturday, April 21, 2007
Potpourri-2
Among the various things I did in last few weeks, I watched Rhapsody in August, Gone with The Wind, Saving Private Ryan and read Arundhati Roy's An Ordinary Persons Guide to Empire. The one thing that was common in all these was "WAR".
Rhapsody in August is a Japanese film directed by Akira Kurosawa. Its a simple story which shows how 3 generations react to the bombing of Nagasaki. It is not considered as Akira's best one, but this movie fulfilled my long desire of watching an Akira movie. My another wish of watching Sathyajit ray's work was also fulfilled with Aparajito. With subtitles and with powerful use of cinema language watching neither an Japanese film or Bengali film is not so difficult. I liked Rhapsody. The location, background score and the way the story moves, like a stream running silently through woods, reminds me Adoor's Nizalkuthhu. The main character is an old lady who lost her hair and husband in bombing of Nagasaki. Her grand children are with her for vacation as their parents went to Hawaii to visit a person in dead bed who is considered to be old lady's brother. The old lady is not able to recognise her brother and so she is not ready to visit him. Further he married an American woman. The grand children persuade her to visit Hawaii, so that they could also visit. But they gradually change their idea (especially after visiting the place where bomb dropped in Nagasaki). Finally the lady accepts to go and so they send a mail she will come to Hawaii after anniversary of bombing which will be the anniversary for her husband too. Meantime the second generation people come back and in all praise for their new relatives, because of their affluent status. The old lady and the younger ones get irritated by this talk.When the old lady's son and daughter come to know about the reference to bombing in the mail sent , they are worried that it will embarrass their new relatives and the welcome hand may be withdrawn. But on contrary the Japanese-American relative (son of old lady's brother) come to take part in the anniversary and feels sorry for his uncle's death. The film ends with him leaving back to Hawaii as his father expires and the old lady behaves in hallucination on the anniversary day of bombing. More than the film I loved the title which sounded like a poem and represented movie well. Through the story he beautifully shows the emotions the different people undergo about bombing. The war is over but its haunting thoughts still linger. The story is not blaming anyone for war, it just show how cruel a war and what a war can achieve is nothing but loss for all. A beautiful statement about war comes in Gone with the wind. At the end of war nothing exists and no one knows why they fought it and what they want or got.
Gone withe wind uses American civil war as a backdrop. Its a lengthy movie with wonderful acting by the two leading pair. The story is too complex. More than story what was great in the story is the characters consistency. Its more about people than about incidents. Incidents exists to establish them. The interesting thing about the movie is, it is not about good Vs Evil, which I fell never exists in real life. The people are not black or white. They are Grey. People who openly proclaim that they are selfish and act so and who always want to prove that their benevolent hearted and try to live so and under some instances expose their selfishness. This is a thing which I liked in this movie than Rand's work. In her novels in the heart its always good vs evil and only difference is the evil are those who were generally shown as good in most of the works. she too will present people in the middle but her story won't be about them and she also say service as a sin. But gone with the wind just points the selfishness which lies deep inside the benevolent face we wear. It doesn't say It is good or Its bad.It just says It will exist. Its a movie at the end you won't fall in love /try to emulate one character or loath one. But on contrary you will learn to accept the versatility of life. On the flip side the film shows slavery with an soft corner, but for that it's a good cinema.
Saving Private Ryan- Hollywood -Steven Spielberg film. It spares no chance to show how caring American government on its citizens (well the whole film is all about it). It takes us through the modern battle field which is nothing but the streets and beach shores in which we will relax on a normal day. The film shows, what drives the military men to fight- kill otherwise will be killed,the way man behaves in front of death, the moral consolation he says to himself for the butcher he does and the need of strict status quo in war front. Above all the film reminded me how precious the peace that I enjoy now is.
Arundhati Roys "An ordinary persons Guide to Empire" has nothing but her hatred for American and Indian ruling power. I wonder is this how Ellsworth Toohey's writing would be- may be or may be not. When she reason out why she hates these power centres, it makes perfect sense but it fails to impress as her solutions are hollow. I wonder do they have any alternative? The result is a highly rhetoric work (with excellent use of metaphors and language- i liked the phrase " do turkeys enjoy thanksgiving?") which looks like the oration our political leaders make during election. What she suggest is destruction of existing system. But what next? We have several examples in history where people who desired to build a new system and started the road map with complete destruction of existing system and lost path after that. But still people do it . Is it the only path available? or is it the easiest path to become a demagogue?
Rhapsody in August is a Japanese film directed by Akira Kurosawa. Its a simple story which shows how 3 generations react to the bombing of Nagasaki. It is not considered as Akira's best one, but this movie fulfilled my long desire of watching an Akira movie. My another wish of watching Sathyajit ray's work was also fulfilled with Aparajito. With subtitles and with powerful use of cinema language watching neither an Japanese film or Bengali film is not so difficult. I liked Rhapsody. The location, background score and the way the story moves, like a stream running silently through woods, reminds me Adoor's Nizalkuthhu. The main character is an old lady who lost her hair and husband in bombing of Nagasaki. Her grand children are with her for vacation as their parents went to Hawaii to visit a person in dead bed who is considered to be old lady's brother. The old lady is not able to recognise her brother and so she is not ready to visit him. Further he married an American woman. The grand children persuade her to visit Hawaii, so that they could also visit. But they gradually change their idea (especially after visiting the place where bomb dropped in Nagasaki). Finally the lady accepts to go and so they send a mail she will come to Hawaii after anniversary of bombing which will be the anniversary for her husband too. Meantime the second generation people come back and in all praise for their new relatives, because of their affluent status. The old lady and the younger ones get irritated by this talk.When the old lady's son and daughter come to know about the reference to bombing in the mail sent , they are worried that it will embarrass their new relatives and the welcome hand may be withdrawn. But on contrary the Japanese-American relative (son of old lady's brother) come to take part in the anniversary and feels sorry for his uncle's death. The film ends with him leaving back to Hawaii as his father expires and the old lady behaves in hallucination on the anniversary day of bombing. More than the film I loved the title which sounded like a poem and represented movie well. Through the story he beautifully shows the emotions the different people undergo about bombing. The war is over but its haunting thoughts still linger. The story is not blaming anyone for war, it just show how cruel a war and what a war can achieve is nothing but loss for all. A beautiful statement about war comes in Gone with the wind. At the end of war nothing exists and no one knows why they fought it and what they want or got.
Gone withe wind uses American civil war as a backdrop. Its a lengthy movie with wonderful acting by the two leading pair. The story is too complex. More than story what was great in the story is the characters consistency. Its more about people than about incidents. Incidents exists to establish them. The interesting thing about the movie is, it is not about good Vs Evil, which I fell never exists in real life. The people are not black or white. They are Grey. People who openly proclaim that they are selfish and act so and who always want to prove that their benevolent hearted and try to live so and under some instances expose their selfishness. This is a thing which I liked in this movie than Rand's work. In her novels in the heart its always good vs evil and only difference is the evil are those who were generally shown as good in most of the works. she too will present people in the middle but her story won't be about them and she also say service as a sin. But gone with the wind just points the selfishness which lies deep inside the benevolent face we wear. It doesn't say It is good or Its bad.It just says It will exist. Its a movie at the end you won't fall in love /try to emulate one character or loath one. But on contrary you will learn to accept the versatility of life. On the flip side the film shows slavery with an soft corner, but for that it's a good cinema.
Saving Private Ryan- Hollywood -Steven Spielberg film. It spares no chance to show how caring American government on its citizens (well the whole film is all about it). It takes us through the modern battle field which is nothing but the streets and beach shores in which we will relax on a normal day. The film shows, what drives the military men to fight- kill otherwise will be killed,the way man behaves in front of death, the moral consolation he says to himself for the butcher he does and the need of strict status quo in war front. Above all the film reminded me how precious the peace that I enjoy now is.
Arundhati Roys "An ordinary persons Guide to Empire" has nothing but her hatred for American and Indian ruling power. I wonder is this how Ellsworth Toohey's writing would be- may be or may be not. When she reason out why she hates these power centres, it makes perfect sense but it fails to impress as her solutions are hollow. I wonder do they have any alternative? The result is a highly rhetoric work (with excellent use of metaphors and language- i liked the phrase " do turkeys enjoy thanksgiving?") which looks like the oration our political leaders make during election. What she suggest is destruction of existing system. But what next? We have several examples in history where people who desired to build a new system and started the road map with complete destruction of existing system and lost path after that. But still people do it . Is it the only path available? or is it the easiest path to become a demagogue?
Monday, April 9, 2007
கதை கதையாம் காரணமாம்
"பாட்டி அப்பளம் சுட்டாள்"-சிறுகதை.
"பாட்டி வானலியில் எண்ணை ஊற்றினாள். அப்பளக் கட்டை எடுத்தாள்....." -நாவல்.
இந்த பகுப்பை ஆதரிக்கா விட்டாலும் எதிர்க்காதவன் நான். ஆனால், நாவல், சிறுகதை சார்ந்து என்னுள் இருந்த எண்ணங்களை தெளிவடைய செய்தது R.K. Narayan இன் Malgudi Days. இந்த சிறுகதை தொகுப்பு நான் இதற்குமுன் படித்த சிறுகதைகளில் ரசித்தவையையும் , அதற்கான காரணத்தையும் உணர்த்தியது.
நான் படித்தவற்றில் பெரும்பாலுமானவை நாவல்களே. பெரும்பாலும் நாவல் படிக்கும் வேகத்திற்கு சிறுகதை தொகுப்பு படிக்க முடிவதில்லை. ஒரு சிறுகதைக்கும் மற்றொன்றும்கிடையே போதுமான இடைவெளி தேவைபடுகிறது. தொடர்ந்து 3/4 சிறுகதை படித்தால் அடுத்த சிறுகதையை ரசிக்க முடியவில்லை. ஆனால் நாவலில் தொடர்ந்து பல அத்தியாயங்கள் படிக்க முடிகிறது. இது கூட நான் சிறுகதையை தவிர்க்க காரணமாக இருக்கலாம். மற்றொரு விசயம், வார பத்திரிக்கைகள் கவிதைக்கு பிறகு அதிகம் கொலை பன்னியது சிறுகதைகளைதான்.
சிறுகதைகள் பெரும்பாலும் பேசுவது ஒரு குறிப்பிட்ட நிகழ்வைதான். பெரும்பாலும் அது சாதரண மனிதர்களின் வாழ்வில் நிகழ்கின்ற சற்றே வித்தியாசமன நிகழ்வுகளை பற்றியே பேசுகிறது. ஆனால் நாவலுக்கோ சற்றே அசாதராணமான நிகழ்வுகளும், நிகழ்வுகளைவிட ஏன் அது நிகழ்கிறது என்பது சார்ந்த நம்பகதன்மையை ஏற்படுத்த வேண்டிய அவசியமும் ஏற்படுகிறது. சிறுகதை சாதரண மனிதர்களை சுற்றி நிகழ்வதால் charachter establishment/ consistencyக்கு ரொம்ப மெனக்கெடவேண்டியது இல்லை. அப்படி chrachter establishment செய்ய முயற்சிக்கிற சிறுகதைகள் ஏதோ அரைகுறையாக முடிந்ததாகவே தோன்றுகிறது. நாவலுக்கு ஒரு முழுமையான முடிவு அவசியம் ஆகிறது. ஆனால் ஒரு சிறுகதையின் பெரும்பகுதி வாசிப்பவரின் கற்பனையில் இருக்கிறது. அந்த கதை பேசும் நிகழ்ச்சிக்கு பின் அந்த கதாபாத்திரம் என்ன செய்யும் என்பது வாசகனின் கற்பனையில் நிகழ்கிறது. அதனால்தான் சிறுகதைகளுக்கு இடையே இடைவேளை தேவை படுகிறது.
swami and friends மட்டுமே படித்திருந்ததால் R.K Narayan ஒரு நகைச்சுவை எழுத்தாளராகவே தெரிந்தார். அது எவ்வளவு தவறு என்பது இந்த வாசிப்புக்கு பின்தான் புரிந்தது. ஒருசிறுகதையில், நாய் ஒன்று பிச்சைகாரனிடம் இருக்கும். அதை அவன் அடிமை போல் நடத்துவான். சிலர் அந்த நாயை விடுவிப்பார்கள் , ஆனால் சில நாட்களில் அந்த நாய் மீண்டும் அவனிடமே அடிமையாகி விடும். இந்த கதை எனக்கு எதோ நாயை பற்றி மட்டும் சொல்வதாக படவில்லை. வாழ்க்கையில் மாற்றங்களுக்கு மருகும் மனிதர்கள், பிரச்சனைகளை சமயோதிகமாக சமாளிப்பவர்கள், கடந்த காலங்களிலே வாழ்பவார்கள், என எல்லா மனிதர்களையும் காணமுடிகிறது.
கற்பனைதிறன் நிறைந்த அதே சமயம் உலகியலை உற்று கவனிப்பவரின் படைப்பு.
"பாட்டி வானலியில் எண்ணை ஊற்றினாள். அப்பளக் கட்டை எடுத்தாள்....." -நாவல்.
இந்த பகுப்பை ஆதரிக்கா விட்டாலும் எதிர்க்காதவன் நான். ஆனால், நாவல், சிறுகதை சார்ந்து என்னுள் இருந்த எண்ணங்களை தெளிவடைய செய்தது R.K. Narayan இன் Malgudi Days. இந்த சிறுகதை தொகுப்பு நான் இதற்குமுன் படித்த சிறுகதைகளில் ரசித்தவையையும் , அதற்கான காரணத்தையும் உணர்த்தியது.
நான் படித்தவற்றில் பெரும்பாலுமானவை நாவல்களே. பெரும்பாலும் நாவல் படிக்கும் வேகத்திற்கு சிறுகதை தொகுப்பு படிக்க முடிவதில்லை. ஒரு சிறுகதைக்கும் மற்றொன்றும்கிடையே போதுமான இடைவெளி தேவைபடுகிறது. தொடர்ந்து 3/4 சிறுகதை படித்தால் அடுத்த சிறுகதையை ரசிக்க முடியவில்லை. ஆனால் நாவலில் தொடர்ந்து பல அத்தியாயங்கள் படிக்க முடிகிறது. இது கூட நான் சிறுகதையை தவிர்க்க காரணமாக இருக்கலாம். மற்றொரு விசயம், வார பத்திரிக்கைகள் கவிதைக்கு பிறகு அதிகம் கொலை பன்னியது சிறுகதைகளைதான்.
சிறுகதைகள் பெரும்பாலும் பேசுவது ஒரு குறிப்பிட்ட நிகழ்வைதான். பெரும்பாலும் அது சாதரண மனிதர்களின் வாழ்வில் நிகழ்கின்ற சற்றே வித்தியாசமன நிகழ்வுகளை பற்றியே பேசுகிறது. ஆனால் நாவலுக்கோ சற்றே அசாதராணமான நிகழ்வுகளும், நிகழ்வுகளைவிட ஏன் அது நிகழ்கிறது என்பது சார்ந்த நம்பகதன்மையை ஏற்படுத்த வேண்டிய அவசியமும் ஏற்படுகிறது. சிறுகதை சாதரண மனிதர்களை சுற்றி நிகழ்வதால் charachter establishment/ consistencyக்கு ரொம்ப மெனக்கெடவேண்டியது இல்லை. அப்படி chrachter establishment செய்ய முயற்சிக்கிற சிறுகதைகள் ஏதோ அரைகுறையாக முடிந்ததாகவே தோன்றுகிறது. நாவலுக்கு ஒரு முழுமையான முடிவு அவசியம் ஆகிறது. ஆனால் ஒரு சிறுகதையின் பெரும்பகுதி வாசிப்பவரின் கற்பனையில் இருக்கிறது. அந்த கதை பேசும் நிகழ்ச்சிக்கு பின் அந்த கதாபாத்திரம் என்ன செய்யும் என்பது வாசகனின் கற்பனையில் நிகழ்கிறது. அதனால்தான் சிறுகதைகளுக்கு இடையே இடைவேளை தேவை படுகிறது.
swami and friends மட்டுமே படித்திருந்ததால் R.K Narayan ஒரு நகைச்சுவை எழுத்தாளராகவே தெரிந்தார். அது எவ்வளவு தவறு என்பது இந்த வாசிப்புக்கு பின்தான் புரிந்தது. ஒருசிறுகதையில், நாய் ஒன்று பிச்சைகாரனிடம் இருக்கும். அதை அவன் அடிமை போல் நடத்துவான். சிலர் அந்த நாயை விடுவிப்பார்கள் , ஆனால் சில நாட்களில் அந்த நாய் மீண்டும் அவனிடமே அடிமையாகி விடும். இந்த கதை எனக்கு எதோ நாயை பற்றி மட்டும் சொல்வதாக படவில்லை. வாழ்க்கையில் மாற்றங்களுக்கு மருகும் மனிதர்கள், பிரச்சனைகளை சமயோதிகமாக சமாளிப்பவர்கள், கடந்த காலங்களிலே வாழ்பவார்கள், என எல்லா மனிதர்களையும் காணமுடிகிறது.
கற்பனைதிறன் நிறைந்த அதே சமயம் உலகியலை உற்று கவனிப்பவரின் படைப்பு.
Sunday, March 4, 2007
Potpourri
There are several things which I thought of writing and got slipped as I am travelling in all the 4 ships valluvar said in kural 605 . I am trying to put everything in this blog . Possibly there could be some accuracy errors as I have to refresh my memory and write.
1. I watched pachaikili on the first day, in a theatre in San Jose which is being used to screen Indian movies alone. The theatre was too small and screen looked archaic. Still the movie watching experience was not bad, because of, good air circulation, good sound system and not so bad chairs. I think the rural theatres in Tamilnadu can also be maintained like this. But the catch is these theatres charge same as the good looking theatres but in Tamilnadu there is a huge difference. About the movie, every one has their own reasons why pachaikili fails to satisfy. When I watched the first half I could not help but to think of Balumahendra. Everything is same except colors and background. In Balu movies it will be simple (i don't have a better word to put) which makes us to feel we are watching it in life and not in screen. Here its like Mani movies. The color contrasts ,tints and background music which often shows its presence makes us to remind we are watching a movie. The second half is typical Gautham masala, and the last session is an unwanted appendage. Further dialogues are not so consistent. In a conversation which is interspersed with English words, the lady uses the word"கணவர்". I don't think no one will use that word in such place. I wish he could have given more care for dialogue and avoided these glitches.But still I like the movie for the first half and enjoy it in the second half except for last 20 minutes or so.
2. Read 4 Novels in last 3 weeks. Black Friday by James Patterson, lord of rings part1, Eye of the needle by Ken Follet, Silence of the lambs by Thomas Harris. Most of the page-turner genre novels search for something or someone. This is common in all the three novels (Lord of Rings has also something like that but in different context. So lets leave it). But what makes the difference is the way it is presented. Black Friday fails miserably because its too brief. It does not establish any character. It has all the things that these genre of novels have: protagonist has to win over time, there is an insider, the negative character is misguided by someone who exists in both good and evil group. But all these happens in a hurry. So we don't feel an exhilaration or relief when all veils are removed . We neither feel the sense of urgency or the weight of expedition . The one-liners are too banal. The novel fails miserably.
Eye of the needle becomes great because of the meticulousness of details. First few pages clearly shows its written by an English novelist. Its a simple spy novel (Might be a path break when its published. But now I am reading it after reading some novels which came later.) A spy gets some privileged info, police want to stop him. Certain lines uttered by the main characters are nice but its few. What makes it interesting is the details. A worthy read. Looking forward to read more from the author.
I took silence of lambs as there are more references for the movie and I could not get the movie. I could not remember anything I read so far as vulgar / crude as this. May be its because of the people it deals with. But the novel has correct mix of thriller and emotion. There are not much details about why the serial killer had become so, but the novel is not much about him. There are several instances which reminded me some of the scenes in Tamil film. We can call it inspiration or plagiarism depending on where we belong. Especially the personal reason of Kamal to chase the psychopath in vettayaiyadu vilaiyadu or the scene Nandhu introduced in Aalavandhan. Lot more. There are lot of details about the way how the FBI zeros down the serial killer. The interrogations with former forensic psychiatrist turned cannibalistic sociopath is well crafted. FBI knows he knows the serial killer, but made him to believe that they are using his intelligence and asks for clue and traces from it. The spiralling way the story moves based on his clues, the complications that comes in the middle, altogether makes a nice plot. The movie is not much action and mostly based on interrogation and I wonder how it was made as a good film . It should be a good work. Have to see it.
3. I watched Charlie Chaplin's City Lights. Its a simple love story. There is an interesting piece of comedy sequence in the movie. There are also some nice acting scenes by Chaplin, especially in the climax. But when I see the movie with the idea that it came some 75 years back, i could not help but to remember how much the movie is used by Tamil film makers(whom only i know to comment). The whole film was broken into different pieces and used by most of our directors.
1. I watched pachaikili on the first day, in a theatre in San Jose which is being used to screen Indian movies alone. The theatre was too small and screen looked archaic. Still the movie watching experience was not bad, because of, good air circulation, good sound system and not so bad chairs. I think the rural theatres in Tamilnadu can also be maintained like this. But the catch is these theatres charge same as the good looking theatres but in Tamilnadu there is a huge difference. About the movie, every one has their own reasons why pachaikili fails to satisfy. When I watched the first half I could not help but to think of Balumahendra. Everything is same except colors and background. In Balu movies it will be simple (i don't have a better word to put) which makes us to feel we are watching it in life and not in screen. Here its like Mani movies. The color contrasts ,tints and background music which often shows its presence makes us to remind we are watching a movie. The second half is typical Gautham masala, and the last session is an unwanted appendage. Further dialogues are not so consistent. In a conversation which is interspersed with English words, the lady uses the word"கணவர்". I don't think no one will use that word in such place. I wish he could have given more care for dialogue and avoided these glitches.But still I like the movie for the first half and enjoy it in the second half except for last 20 minutes or so.
2. Read 4 Novels in last 3 weeks. Black Friday by James Patterson, lord of rings part1, Eye of the needle by Ken Follet, Silence of the lambs by Thomas Harris. Most of the page-turner genre novels search for something or someone. This is common in all the three novels (Lord of Rings has also something like that but in different context. So lets leave it). But what makes the difference is the way it is presented. Black Friday fails miserably because its too brief. It does not establish any character. It has all the things that these genre of novels have: protagonist has to win over time, there is an insider, the negative character is misguided by someone who exists in both good and evil group. But all these happens in a hurry. So we don't feel an exhilaration or relief when all veils are removed . We neither feel the sense of urgency or the weight of expedition . The one-liners are too banal. The novel fails miserably.
Eye of the needle becomes great because of the meticulousness of details. First few pages clearly shows its written by an English novelist. Its a simple spy novel (Might be a path break when its published. But now I am reading it after reading some novels which came later.) A spy gets some privileged info, police want to stop him. Certain lines uttered by the main characters are nice but its few. What makes it interesting is the details. A worthy read. Looking forward to read more from the author.
I took silence of lambs as there are more references for the movie and I could not get the movie. I could not remember anything I read so far as vulgar / crude as this. May be its because of the people it deals with. But the novel has correct mix of thriller and emotion. There are not much details about why the serial killer had become so, but the novel is not much about him. There are several instances which reminded me some of the scenes in Tamil film. We can call it inspiration or plagiarism depending on where we belong. Especially the personal reason of Kamal to chase the psychopath in vettayaiyadu vilaiyadu or the scene Nandhu introduced in Aalavandhan. Lot more. There are lot of details about the way how the FBI zeros down the serial killer. The interrogations with former forensic psychiatrist turned cannibalistic sociopath is well crafted. FBI knows he knows the serial killer, but made him to believe that they are using his intelligence and asks for clue and traces from it. The spiralling way the story moves based on his clues, the complications that comes in the middle, altogether makes a nice plot. The movie is not much action and mostly based on interrogation and I wonder how it was made as a good film . It should be a good work. Have to see it.
3. I watched Charlie Chaplin's City Lights. Its a simple love story. There is an interesting piece of comedy sequence in the movie. There are also some nice acting scenes by Chaplin, especially in the climax. But when I see the movie with the idea that it came some 75 years back, i could not help but to remember how much the movie is used by Tamil film makers(whom only i know to comment). The whole film was broken into different pieces and used by most of our directors.
Wednesday, December 20, 2006
Interesting Articles
Among the things which I read recently, I liked two articles(as a matter of fact, nowadays I am not reading much). These two articles have nothing in common except they are associated with the things that I love. One, is noble prize acceptance speech by Orhan Pamuk. The interesting thing in it is his opinion on writers, what make people to write and how far they feel secluded. His thoughts about his dad were also interesting.
Other is an interview by Gautham . During my good old schooldays I was much interested in reading film news. Then at some point it became banal. The only difference across different news are only the names, the contents were same. I began to read only if the news is associated with people like kamal, prakash raj, balumahendra as their interviews were slightly different. But this interview is a nice one. There are some surprise elements also, and I am not much serious about it. It was obvious all was not well between kamal and goutham in VV. Kamal looked like a reluctant player in it. In metro plus before the movie release kamal stated “this is a masala movie which doesn’t disguise itself as a different one”. But in my opinion it worked out in favor of the movie. In the movie, what I saw was the Kamal I used to see in television interviews. The only thing that raised my eyebrows is Gautham statement first half is my choice second half is Kamal and producer choice. I too felt that the second half is to cater ‘c’ centers. Well Gautham too showed the difference by using different colour shades. Might be Kamal don’t want to do other than masala in other productions, after aalavandhan fiasco and its repercussions. After reading “derailed” story I too believe it is not commercially viable with the star salary of Kamal. Generally Gautham films are with too much of violence and now he himself says “Quentin Tarantino kind”. Let us hope “pachaikilli muthucharam” is not so excruciating.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)